The
spectacle of the 2012 London Olympics should be subtitled “The Bashing of the
Chinese Athlete.” Yesterday, Andrew Jacobs of the New York Times published
a much-discussed piece called “Heavy Burden on Athletes Takes Joy
Away From China’s Olympic Success.” In it, all kinds of “concerns”
are raised about the toll “the nation’s draconian sports system” is taking on
the country’s athletes. It tells tales of poverty, loneliness and despair
amongst China’s sports stars once the cheering has stopped. Their athletes are
described as being exploited by an unfeeling government monolith that acted as
a surrogate family until they were no longer of any use. Parents of China’s
Olympians are quoted saying, “We accepted a long time ago that she doesn’t
belong to us. I don’t even dare think about things like enjoying family
happiness.” Other parents tell of not being able to recognize their own
children after years apart.
The
other dominant story about China are the continuing unfounded allegations that
16-year-old Chinese swimmer Ye Shiwen took performance-enhancing drugs to win
gold. Executive Director of the American
Swim Coaches Association John Leonard called Shiwen’s
world-record 400-meter individual medley swim “disturbing.” He is also
continuing to describe her closing freestyle leg of 58.68 seconds as
“impossible.”
There
have been a series of ugly articles about Shiwen, none uglier perhaps than a piece by UK’s Daily Mail’s
David Jones titled “Forging of the Mandarin Mermaid: How
Chinese children are taken away from their home and brutalized into future
Olympians.” Not “trained” but “brutalized.”
Then
there was Bob Costas’s handling of the issue on NBC, which involved the raising
of an unfounded accusation on the basis of it’s being news and then using it to
advance the allegation. I’m surprised Costas didn’t turn to special guest
Michelle Bachmann to speak about rumors of Shiwen’s time in the Muslim
Brotherhood. There is zero evidence but Shiwen is guilty in the Western media
with no avenue to prove her innocence.
None
of this is to defend China’s state-run system of producing athletes. But it
seems rather painfully obvious why we are seeing this tidal wave of suspicion,
drug allegations and concern for the “children.” China is the chief economic
rival in the world to the United States. Just like during the cold war, the
Olympics have become a proxy war where “medal counts” connote more than
bragging rights but are a comment on the health of a nation. China is rivaling the
United States in medal counts so its dominance has to be explained in as
critical, ugly and even as racist a way as possible. The message is that the
Chinese have medals because they just don’t love their kids.
If
the New York Times is that concerned about the brutalization
of young athletes, that battle begins at home. US athletes don’t have to
navigate a state-run athletic system but something perhaps far more pernicious.
Unlike China, US athletes get no government subsidies whatsoever. Their number
one obstacle to the medal stand isn’t ability but poverty. As one study by the
USA Track and Field Foundation demonstrated, “Approximately
50% of our athletes who rank in the top 10 in the USA in their event make
less than $15,000 annually from the sport (sponsorship, grants, prize money,
etc.).”
Both
systems create “collateral damage.” Both systems are in need of reform. The
only difference is the narrative. When we hear that swimmer Ryan Lochte’s
parents are facing foreclosure on their home, or that track star Lolo Jones’s
family was homeless, or that gymnast Gabby Douglas was sent from her mother in
Virginia Beach to live with strangers at the age of 14, those are tales of
heroism and sacrifice. We celebrate their pain instead of condemning it or even
being disturbed by it.
The
US system also contains its share of countless broken bodies and broken lives,
discarded in pursuit of gold. The ongoing sexual abuse scandal in USA Swimming
is an example of this.As ESPN’s T.J. Quinn and Greg Amante wrote in 2010,
“Youth swimming coaches, many certified by USA Swimming, the sport’s national
governing body, have been able to molest young swimmers and then move from town
to town, escaping criminal charges and continuing to victimize other under-aged
swimmer…. ESPN found the abusive coaches, some of whom molested young swimmers
for more than 30 years, avoided detection because of a number of factors: USA
Swimming and other organizations had inadequate oversight, many local coaches,
parents and swimming officials failed to report inappropriate contact they
witnessed, and some parents, driven to see their children succeed,
ignored or did not recognize what should have been red flags.” [My
emphasis.]
Then
there is USA Gymnastics. Joan Ryan, in her brilliant 1995 book, Little Girls in Pretty Boxes, wrote the
following about our system for producing gold medal gymnasts: “What I found was
a story about legal, even celebrated child abuse. In the dark troughs along the
road to the Olympics lay the bodies of girls who stumbled on the way, broken by
the work, pressure and humiliation. I found a girl whose father left the family
when she quit gymnastics at the age of 13, who scraped her arms and legs with
razors to dull her emotional pain and who needed a two-hour pass from a
psychiatric hospital to attend her high-school graduation. Girls who broke
their necks and backs. One who so desperately sought the perfect, weightless
gymnastic body that she starved herself to death.”
Imagine
for a moment if Bob Costas or the New York Times had stories
like this to tell about China. If they did, we’d know them by heart. Instead,
the pain of US athletes remains in the shadows. The message to all US critics
of China’s Olympic system should be, “Physician, heal thyself.” The battle to
make Olympic training more humane begins at home.
Please consider making a donation to keep this site going.